Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

Ramos v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Dec 1, 2017

Douglas

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This original petition seeks a writ of prohibition or mandamus directing the district court to preclude the State's expert from administering certain tests in the course of determining whether petitioner is intellectually disabled. Having reviewed the petition, we are not convinced that petitioner has met his burden of demonstrating that our intervention is warranted at this time. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004); see also Round Hill Gen. Imp. Dist. v. Newman, 97 Nev. 601, 637 P.2d 534 (1981). We therefore

ORDER the petition DENIED.

We deny petitioner's motion for a stay of the district court proceedings as moot. --------

/s/_________, J.


Douglas /s/_________, J.
Gibbons /s/_________, J.
Pickering cc: Hon. Jennifer P. Togliatti, District Judge



Nobles & Yanez Law Firm


The Law Offices of Ivette Amelburu Maningo


Attorney General/Carson City


Clark County District Attorney


Eighth District Court Clerk