Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

Burgess-Walls v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 22, 2011
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

William H. Yohn

CIVIL ACTION

Order

AND NOW, this 22nd day of August 2011, upon consideration of defendants' motion to dismiss (Document No. 3) and plaintiff's brief in opposition to the motion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that

(1) defendants' motion to dismiss is DENIED as to Count I as to the Title VII claims of retaliation against the City, but the remainder of the motion as to Count I is GRANTED;

(2) defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED as to Count II;

(3) defendants' motion to dismiss is DENIED as to COUNT III as to the PHRA claim of retaliation occurring in November 2009 against the City, but the remainder of the motion as to Count III is GRANTED;

(4) defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED as to Count IV; and

(5) Lieutenant Richard Brown is DISMISSED as a party to this action.

William H. Yohn, Jr., Judge