Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

WIEDENMAYER, ET AL. v. VILLANUEVA, ET AL

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Dec 15, 1969
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
Smart Summary (Beta)

Factual and Procedural Background

This opinion addresses an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division, in a case involving multiple parties including plaintiffs-respondents and defendant-appellant Charles E. Villanueva as guardian ad litem for minors Bruce Alexander Johnson and Jennieanne Josephine Johnson. The appeal follows the Appellate Division's majority opinion authored by Judge Kilkenny, reported at 106 N.J. Super. 161.

Legal Issues Presented

The opinion addresses a procedural matter and does not frame distinct legal issues.

Arguments of the Parties

The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments.

Table of Precedents Cited

No precedents were cited in the provided opinion.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The court affirmed the judgment based solely on the reasoning expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Kilkenny in the Appellate Division. No additional analysis or elaboration was provided in this per curiam opinion.

Holding and Implications

The judgment is affirmed.

The decision directly upholds the prior appellate ruling without modification. No new precedent was established, and the effect is to maintain the status quo between the parties as determined by the Appellate Division.

Show all summary ...

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Kilkenny in the Appellate Division, 106 N.J. Super. 161.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

For reversal — None.