- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
In re Voth
PER CURIAM
ALD-252 NOT PRECEDENTIAL On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey
(Related to D.N.J. Civ. No. 3-14-cv-07582) Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.
May 12, 2016
Before: AMBRO, SHWARTZ, and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges OPINION PER CURIAM
This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent. --------
Frank E. Voth filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the District Court to rule on his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The District Court granted that motion on April 28, 2016. Thus, because Voth has received all of the relief he requested, his petition is moot and we will dismiss it on that basis. See Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp., 77 F.3d 690, 698-99 (3d Cir. 1996).
Alert