Castro v. City of N.Y.

Sim & Records, LLP, Bayside (Sang J. Sim of counsel), for appellant. *513Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Elizabeth I. Freedman of counsel), for respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Larry S. Schachner, J.), entered April 23 2012, which, in this sidewalk trip and fall case, granted the City defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The pleadings, 50–h hearing testimony, photographs, and the Big Apple Map, viewed together, show that the City did not have written notice of the sidewalk condition which plaintiff alleges caused her to trip and fall ( see Administrative Code of City of N.Y. § 7–201[c]; D'Onofrio v. City of New York, 11 N.Y.3d 581, 585, 873 N.Y.S.2d 251, 901 N.E.2d 744 [2008];Roldan v. City of New York, 36 A.D.3d 484, 831 N.Y.S.2d 110 [1st Dept. 2007] ). Plaintiff's argument that the City is liable because it is required to maintain the sidewalk pursuant to Administrative Code § 7–210, even if it did not have written notice of the defect, is unavailing ( see Sondervan v. City of New York, 84 A.D.3d 625, 924 N.Y.S.2d 54 [1st Dept. 2011] ).

In any event, the photographs plaintiff submitted and the evidence of the circumstances surrounding the accident establish that the defect is trivial in nature, and did not amount to a hazard ( see Trincere v. County of Suffolk, 90 N.Y.2d 976, 977–978, 665 N.Y.S.2d 615, 688 N.E.2d 489 [1997];Schwartz v. Bleu Evolution Bar & Rest. Corp., 90 A.D.3d 488, 935 N.Y.S.2d 10 [1st Dept. 2011] ).

TOM, J.P., SWEENY, DeGRASSE, MANZANET–DANIELS, CLARK, JJ., concur.