Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

Perryman v. Deacon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Mar 2, 2014

MARCO A. HERNANDEZ

ORDER

Dennis Perryman

Pro Se Plaintiff Shannon M. Vincent
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Trial Division, CLS



Attorney for Defendants HERNANDEZ, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta issued a Findings and Recommendation ("F&R") [78] on January 31, 2014, recommending that Defendants' motion for summary judgment [45] be granted. Because no objections to the F&R were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's F&R [78]. Accordingly, Defendants' motion for summary judgment [45] is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________


MARCO A. HERNANDEZ


United States District Judge