Gielata v. Eisenhofer

Paul Barbadoro

The motion for leave to file a reply is allowed (Doc. No. 66). There is no possibility that I will be a witness in this case. Further, the mere fact that a jury might learn of rulings or statements I made on the record in a related case does not provide me with a basis for recusal. In short, plaintiff has presented no good and sufficient reason to warrant my recusal. Accordingly, the motion to recuse is denied (Doc. No. 62).

SO ORDERED.

_____________

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Joseph N. Gielata, Esq.

Thomas C. Cronin, Esq.

Roger B. Phillips, Esq.

Michael B. Carlinsky, Esq.

Sanford I. Weisburst, Esq.

William L. Chapman, Esq.