Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

Marlo v. United Parcel Serv., Inc.

UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 8, 2012

DEAN D. PREGERSON

CLOSED
AMENDED JUDGMENT

This action was brought by Michael Marlo against his former employer, United Parcel Service, Inc. Tried before a jury were Plaintiff's claims for relief for (1) retaliation, (2) wrongful termination in violation of public policy, and (3) intentional infliction of emotional distress.

After a bifurcated jury trial, including an initial liability and damages and second punitive damages phase, in which the jury rendered verdict in favor of plaintiff Michael Marlo,

And after post-trial briefings and a hearing before this Court on November 5, 2012, at which the Court denied Defendant's Motion for New Trial and Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, and granted a remittitur as to the punitive damage award which was accepted by plaintiff Michael Marlo,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, DECREED AS FOLLOWS:

1. Judgment is entered in favor of Michael Marlo and against United Parcel Service, Inc. in the following amounts:

a. Economic Loss: $ 1,701,425.00
b. Non-Economic loss: $ 384,000.00
c. Intentional Infliction of
Emotional Distress: $ 116,000.00
d. Punitive Damages: $ 6,604,275.00
TOTAL JUDGMENT: $ 8,805,700.00






2. Plaintiff is awarded costs.

________


DEAN D. PREGERSON


UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE