Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

Walker v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Jul 19, 2012
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

PER CURIAM.


Application for Transfer Denied Sept. 25, 2012.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Philip D. Heagney, Judge.
Gwenda R. Robinson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Chris Koster, Richard A. Starnes, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.




ORDER


PER CURIAM.


The movant, Darold Walker, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties' briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The motion court's order denying the movant's Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).