Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

El v. Max Daetwyler Corp.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Oct 20, 2011
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

PER CURIAM

UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:09-cv-00415-MOC-DCK)

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darryl El, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Pearson Holderness,


ROBINSON, BRADSHAW & HINSON, PA, Charlotte, North Carolina, for


Appellees.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Darryl El appeals the district court's order dismissing his action filed under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2003 & Supp. 2011). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. El v. Max Daetwyler Corp., No. 3:09-cv-00415-MOC-DCK (W.D.N.C. May 9, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED