Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

Richardson v. Newman

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
Jan 28, 2014
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Michael Massengale

ORDER ON MOTION

Date motions filed*: January 22, 2014 Type of motions: Unopposed motion for pro hac vice admission; Motion in support of John W. Spiegel's unopposed motion for pro hac vice admission Party filing motions: John W. Spiegel; Appellees Document to be filed: Is appeal accelerated? No If motion to extend time:

Original due date:
Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date:
Date Requested: ________________


Ordered that motion is:
[v] Granted

If document is to be filed, document due:
[ ] Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time


[ ] Denied
[ ] Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)
[ ] Other: ____________



Judge's signature: Justice Michael Massengale


[×] Acting individually [ ] Acting for the Court
Panel consists of ___________ November 7, 2008 Revision