Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

People v. Majid

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Sep 25, 2012
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Nancy E. Little of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (David C. Bornstein of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene D. Goldberg, J.), entered on or about November 12, 2009, which adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6–C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The record supports the court's discretionary upward departure to level three. The court properly determined that although defendant received points relating to his use of violence in the commission of the underlying sex crime, the risk assessment instrument did not adequately take into account the extreme brutality of the crime, which led to convictions of attempted murder in the second degree, sodomy in the first degree, and robbery in the first degree ( see e.g. People v. Guasp, 95 A.D.3d 608, 944 N.Y.S.2d 112 [1st Dept. 2012] ). These aggravating factors outweighed the mitigating factors cited by defendant.

*708ANDRIAS, J.P., SWEENY, MOSKOWITZ, FREEDMAN, RICHTER, JJ., concur.