Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

Perry v. Capital One

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 29, 2012

Mitchell S. Goldberg

ORDER

AND NOW, this 29th day of February, 2012, upon consideration of Defendant Capital One's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 17), Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 20), and the responses thereto, and for the reasons set forth in the Court's Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's motion is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's motion is DENIED. Plaintiff's recovery shall be limited to statutory damages pursuant to 73 Pa.C.S. ยง 201-9.2.

BY THE COURT:

_____________


Mitchell S. Goldberg
, J.