Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

Bauman v. Daimlerchrysler Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Feb 28, 2014

Terrence Patrick Collingsworth, Esquire, Senior Partner, Natacha H. Thys, Esquire, Senior, Conrad & Scherer, LLP, Washington, DC, Paul Hoffman, Schonbrun Desimone Seplow Harris Hoffman & Harrison, LLP, Venice, CA, for Plaintiff–Appellant. Peter J. Messrobian, Esquire, Sedgwick LLP, Matthew James Kemner, Esquire, Carroll, Burdick & McDonough, LLP, San Francisco, CA, Thomas Henderson Dupree, Jr., Daniel W. Nelson, Esquire, Theodore Olson, Amir C. Tayrani, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendant–Appellee.
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court. D.C. No. CV–04–00194–RMW.
Before: MARY M. SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON, and STEPHEN REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

In accordance with the Supreme Court's opinion of January 14, 2014, as well as the resulting judgment, the district court's order granting defendant's motion to dismiss is AFFIRMED.