Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

Rigor v. Freemont Inv. & Loan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE
Mar 16, 2012

ORDER

Magistrate Judge Thomas M Coffin has filed his Findings and Recommendation on February 13, 2012. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Judge Coffins Findings and Recommendation. Defendants' motion to dismiss (#8) or to strike and/or for a more definitive statement is allowed to the extend the complaint is dismissed. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

________________________


UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE