Toney v. Hakala

JOHN A. ROSS

This matter is before the Court on Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Complaint [ECF No. 164]. In light of the Court's ruling denying Plaintiff's motion for leave [ECF No. 162], Defendants' motion will be denied.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Complaint [164] is DENIED as moot.

_________________

JOHN A. ROSS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE