United States v. Nevada

LARRY R. HICKS

Before the court are the United States' Motion to Exclude Defendants' Expert and Expe: Report (#128), and Defendant's opposition (#135). The evidence in question is pertinent only t< relief. Given the court's order bifurcating the trial, the motion is granted insofar as it seeks to exclude such evidence during the jury phase on liability. Otherwise, the motion is denied witho prejudice to any objections that may be raised during the bench trial on relief.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the United States' Motion to Exclude Defendants' Expert and Expert Report (#128) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

LARRY R. HICKS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE