Leftridge v. Doe

PER CURIAM

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:11-cv-03499-ELH) Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Vernon J. Leftridge, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Vernon J. Leftridge, Jr., appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Leftridge v. Matthews, No. 1:11-cv-03499-ELH (D. Md. filed Sept. 30, 2013, entered Oct. 1, 2013; filed Oct. 10, 2013, entered Oct. 11, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED