United States v. Richardson

M. CASEY RODGERS

Referred to Judge M. Casey Rodgers on August 30, 2012
Motion/Pleadings: SECOND MOTION TO SUPPRESS IRRELEVANT EVIDENCE OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR AN ORDER IN LIMINE WITH MEMORANDUM
Filed by Defendant on 8/24/12 Doc.# 90
RESPONSES:
By Government
on 8/29/12 Doc.# 95
____________ on ______ Doc.# __
______ Stipulated ______ Joint Pldg.
______ Unopposed ______ Consented

JESSICA J. LYUBLANOVITS

CLERK OF COURT
______
LC (1 OR 2)

Mary Maloy

Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 2n day of September, 2012, that:

The relief requested is DENIED on grounds articulated in the government's response. The challenged exhibits have not been presented to the court. Based on the description provided, however, the court finds that the evidence as described is relevant, either as intrinsic to the offense or as evidence of motive, plan, intent, or absence of mistake under Rule 404(b). The defendant remains free to raise objections at trial where relevance and prejudicial impact can be considered in context and the exhibits can be examined. Entered On Docket: _____________ By: __ Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP Copies sent to:_____________

_____________

M. CASEY RODGERS

Chief United States District Judge