Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ
 

Commonwealth v. Simmons

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Apr 29, 2014
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

PER CURIAM.

No. 26 WAP 2013, Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court entered November 30, 2012 at No. 762 WDA 2011, affirming the Judgment of Sentence of the Court of Common Pleas of Cambria County, entered February 17, 2011 at No. CP–11–CR–0001144–1992, Timothy P. Creany, President Judge.
Thomas M. Dickey, Altoona, for Ernest Simmons, Appellant. Scott Michael Lilly, for Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Appellee.
BEFORE: CASTILLE, C.J., SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER, TODD, McCAFFERY, STEVENS, JJ.



Prior report: Pa.Super., 56 A.3d 1280.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.


AND NOW, this 29th day of April, 2014, the Order of the Superior Court is hereby AFFIRMED. Justice STEVENS files a Concurring Statement.
Justice STEVENS, concurring.


I join this Court's per curiam affirmance. Nevertheless, I wish to emphasize my view that the communication of threats made by a probationer to an intended victim is not a requirement to find the probationer engaged in “assaultive behavior” in violation of the general condition for special probation or parole set forth in 37 Pa.Code § 65.4(5)(iii).