United States v. Soto-Hernandez

John E. Simko

Defendant filed pro se a "motion to dismiss indictment or answer bill of particulars." Doc. 21. Because Defendant is represented by counsel, all motions must be made through his lawyer. See United States v. Stanko, 491 F.3d 408, 411 fn.2 (8th Cir. 2007); United States v. Peck, 161 F.3d 1171, 1174 fn. 2 (8th Cir. 1998). Accordingly, is is

ORDERED that Defendant's motion (Doc. 21) is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

______________________

John E. Simko

Unite States Magistrate Judge