Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

Groh v. Monestero

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 29, 2013

Michael M. Baylson

ORDER

AND NOW, this 29th day of April, 2013, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion for Remand (ECF 4), Defendant's Response (ECF 10), and Plaintiff's Reply (ECF 14), and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum of Law, it is hereby ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff's Motion for Remand (ECF 4) is GRANTED. The case is remanded to the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County, Pennsylvania.
2. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF 3) is DENIED as moot.
3. The clerk shall close this case.



BY THE COURT:

___________________________


Michael M. Baylson
, U.S.D.J.