Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

Parker v. J.M. Smucker Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 21, 2013
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Joseph C. Spero

JENNER & BLOCK LLP
Kenneth K. Lee (Cal. Bar No. 264296)
Kate T. Spelman (Cal. Bar No. 269109)
JENNER & BLOCK LLP
Dean N. Panos (applying pro hac vice)
Attorneys for J.M. Smucker Co.




STIPULATION ENLARGING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Plaintiff Diana Parker, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, and Defendant the J.M. Smucker Company, through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, on February 15, 2013, Plaintiff filed a Class Action Complaint (the "Complaint");

WHEREAS, Defendant was served with the Complaint on March 1, 2013;

WHEREAS, pursuant to Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant's response to the Complaint would be due on March 22, 2013;

WHEREAS Plaintiff has agreed to allow Defendant an additional 30 days to respond to the Complaint, making Defendant's response due on April 22, 2013; and

WHEREAS the extension of time will not alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by Court order;

THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), that Defendant shall have an additional 30 days to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, up to and including April 22, 2013.

JENNER & BLOCK LLP

_______________


By: Kenneth K. Lee


Attorneys for Defendant

BLOOD, HURST & O'REARDON, LLP

_______________


By: Timothy G. Blood


Attorneys for Plaintiff

ATTESTATION

I, Kenneth K. Lee, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file the Stipulation Enlarging Time to Respond to Complaint. In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from signatory Timothy G. Blood.

Judge Joseph C. Spero