- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
Lloyd v. Rutherford
John A. Tomasino Clerk, Supreme Court
Lower Tribunal No(s).: 162014CF000956AXXXMA; 452012CF000329CFAXYX; 452012CF000331CFAXYX; 452012CF000332CFAXYX
Petitioner's letter filed with this Court on December 24, 2014, has been treated as a motion for reinstatement, and is hereby granted and it is ordered that the above case is reinstated. Petitioner is hereby directed to show cause on or before January 22, 2015, why the petition for writ of habeas corpus should not be dismissed as unauthorized. See Logan v. State, 846 So. 2d 472, 479 (Fla. 2003) (announcing that "we will not entertain pro se extraordinary writ petitions from criminal defendants seeking affirmative relief in the context of pending trial court criminal cases, where it is clear from the face of the petitions that the petitioners are represented by counsel in the pending criminal proceedings and the petitioners do not clearly indicate that they are seeking to discharge counsel in those proceedings"). Respondent may serve a reply on or before February 2, 2015. No pro se motions or other requests for relief will be ruled upon pending resolution of this show cause order. A True Copy
Test:
/s/_________
John A. Tomasino
Clerk, Supreme Court
eg
Served:
JOHN H. RUTHERFORD, SHERIFF
HON. RONNIE FUSSELL, CLERK
HON. JOHN, CRAWFORD, CLERK
ORVEL WINSTON LLOYD
REGINA LA VERNE WRIGHT
Alert