- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
United States v. Bazzle
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 23, 2012
Berle M. Schiller
ORDERAND NOW, this 23rd day of March, 2012, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Suppress Physical Evidence and Statements, and upon consideration of Defendant's Motion for Disclosure of the Identity and Information Pertaining to the Confidential Informant, the Government's responses thereto, following a suppression hearing on March 19, 2012, and for the reasons provided in this Court's Memorandum dated March 23, 2012, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Defendant's motion for disclosure (Document No. 19) is DENIED.
2. Defendant's motion to suppress (Document No. 20) is DENIED.
BY - THE COURT:
___________
Berle M. Schiller , J.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.