Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

Stoneback v. ArtsQuest

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Oct 17, 2012

MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, U.S.D.J.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 17th day of October, 2012, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Jury Demand (ECF #3) is DENIED without prejudice;
2. Defendant's Motion for a More Definite Statement (ECF #4) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; and
3. Within fourteen (14) days, Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint containing a more definite statement of her claim that she was terminated in violation of the public policy of Pennsylvania.



BY THE COURT:

________


MICHAEL M. BAYLSON
, U.S.D.J.