- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
Stoneback v. ArtsQuest
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Oct 17, 2012
MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, U.S.D.J.
ORDERAND NOW, this 17th day of October, 2012, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Jury Demand (ECF #3) is DENIED without prejudice;
2. Defendant's Motion for a More Definite Statement (ECF #4) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; and
3. Within fourteen (14) days, Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint containing a more definite statement of her claim that she was terminated in violation of the public policy of Pennsylvania.
BY THE COURT:
________
MICHAEL M. BAYLSON , U.S.D.J.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.