Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

State v. Burkhart

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
Jun 4, 2015

PER CURIAM

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Jason D. Scott, District Judge. Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of five years, with a minimum period of confinement of one and one-half years, for grand theft, affirmed. Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Maya P. Waldron, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge; and GRATTON, Judge

____________________

PER CURIAM

Richard Clayton Burkhart pled guilty to grand theft. I.C. ยงยง 18-2403(1), 18-2407(1)(b), and 18-2409. The district court sentenced Burkhart to a unified term of five years, with a minimum period of confinement of one and one-half years. Burkhart filed an I.C.R 35 motion, which the district court denied. Burkhart appeals.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Both our standard of review and the factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant's entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Burkhart's judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.