Lee v. Fulwood

By Order of April 16, 2012, Petitioner was directed to respond by May 17, 2012, to the Government's opposition to his petition for a writ of habeas corpus or risk summary dismissal of the petition, ECF No. 9. Petitioner has neither filed a response nor moved for additional time to do so. He therefore has not opposed Respondents' documented reasons for denying the petition, see Gov't's Opp'n to Pet'r's Pet. for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, ECF No. 8, at 4-7, with which the Court agrees and adopts for the purpose of denying the petition. A separate final order accompanies this Memorandum.

_______________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE