People v. Rapp

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 10, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether Michigan State University Ordinance 15.05 is facially unconstitutional under City of Houston v. Hill, 482 U.S. 451, 107 S.Ct. 2502, 96 L.Ed.2d 398 (1987); and (2) whether MCR 7.101(0) allows taxation of costs in criminal cases appealed in the circuit court.

Persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.