Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

State v. Stackhouse

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Feb 5, 2014

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
Appeal From Marion County
William H. Seals, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia; and Edward W. Stackhouse, Jr., pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED. FEW, C.J., and PIEPER and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.