N.C. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Paschal

PER CURIAM.

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A–31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, North Carolina Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., Inc. v. Paschal, ––– N.C.App. ––––, 752 S.E.2d 775 (2014), affirming an order entered on 30 November 2012 and reversing and remanding an order of summary judgment entered on 6 December 2012, both by Judge G. Wayne Abernathy in Superior Court, Wake County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 18 November 2014. Haywood, Denny & Miller, L.L.P., Durham, by Robert E. Levin, for plaintiff-appellant. Moody, Williams, Roper & Lee, LLP, Siler City, by C. Todd Roper, for defendant-appellees Harley, Thurman, and Reggie Jessup.
Kluttz, Reamer, Hayes, Randolph, & Adkins, L.L.P., Salisbury, by Michael S. Adkins; and Maginnis Law, PLLC, by T. Shawn Howard, for North Carolina Advocates for Justice, amicus curiae.

DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.