Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

Curtis v. City of Oakland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 1, 2012

SUSAN ILLSTON

PAMELA Y. PRICE, ESQ. (STATE BAR NO. 107713)


JOSE F. VERGARA, ESQ. (STATE BAR NO. 251342)


PRICE AND ASSOCIATES


A Professional Law Corporation


Attorneys for Plaintiff


RONALD EL-MALIK CURTIS


MICHAEL W. FOSTER, ESQ. (STATE BAR NO. 127691)


MADELYN JORDAN-DAVIS, ESQ. (STATE BAR NO. 181771)


FOSTER EMPLOYMENT LAW


Attorneys for Defendants


CITY OF OAKLAND, JENNIFER


RAY, JOSEPH TORRES, JOHN


FARRELL and GERALD A. SIMON


STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER MODIFYING THE SCHEDULING ORDER
HON. SUSAN ILLSTON

The parties in the above captioned action hereby stipulate by and through their undersigned counsel of record to request that this Court modify its November 23, 2011 Scheduling Order (Doc. 54) in order to permit the parties to proceed with fact discovery until January 4, 2012.

Good cause exists for this brief continuance because Defendant Joseph Torres will be unavailable to be deposed until January 4, 2012.

PRICE AND ASSOCIATES

____________


PAMELA Y. PRICE, Attorneys for Plaintiff


RONALD EL-MALIK CURTIS


FOSTER EMPLOYMENT LAW

____________


MADELYN JORDAN-DAVIS, Attorneys for


Defendants CITY OF OAKLAND, JENNIFER


RAY, JOSEPH TORRES, JOHN FARRELL, and


GERALD A. SIMON


ORDER

The Court having read and considered the Stipulation of Counsel to modify the scheduling order for the purpose of extending the fact discovery until January 4, 2012, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________


HON. SUSAN ILLSTON


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT