Flores v. U.S. Attorney Gen.

Daniel L. Hovland, District Judge United States District Court

The Plaintiff initiated this action against on April 17, 2015. See Docket No. 1. On May 14, 2015, Judge Miller issued a Report and Recommendation in which he recommended the application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied and the action be dismissed with prejudice as the complaint was so implausible as to render it frivolous. See Docket No. 5. The parties were given fourteen days to file any objections to the Report and Recommendation. No objections were filed.

The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, relevant case law, and the entire record, and finds the Report and Recommendation to be persuasive. The action is frivolous and dismissal is warranted. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 5) in its entirety. The application to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket No. 1) is DENIED and the action is DISMISSED with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated this 2nd day of June, 2015.

/s/ Daniel L. Hovland

Daniel L. Hovland, District Judge

United States District Court