Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

Martinez v. McSweeney

Supreme Court, Queens County, New York.
Nov 19, 2013
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

ROBERT J. McDONALD

ORDERED, that as the plaintiffs have a potentially meritorious cause of action and as the defendants have not demonstrated prejudice by the delay, pursuant to CPLR 306–b plaintiffs' cross-motion is granted and plaintiffs are granted leave to re-serve the summons and complaint within 60 days of service of a copy of this order with notice of entry thereof (see Selmani v. City of New York, 100 A.D.3d 861, 954 N.Y.S.2d 580 [2d Dept.2012]; Prudence v. Wright, 94 A.D.3d 1073, 943 N.Y.S.2d 185 [2d Dept.2012]; Owens v. Chhabra, 72 A.D.3d 664, 897 N.Y.S.2d 912 [2d Dept.2010]; Samet v. Binson, 67 A.D.3d 988, 891 N.Y.S.2d 93 [2d Dept.2009]; Dujany v. Gould, 63 A.D.3d 1496, 882 N.Y.S.2d 343 [3rd Dept.2009]; Cooper v. New York City Bd. of Educ., 55 A.D.3d 526, 864 N.Y.S.2d 317 [2d Dept.2008]; Rosenzweig v. 600 N. St., LLC, 35 A.D.3d 705, 826 N.Y.S.2d 680[2d Dept.2006]; Chiaro v. D'Angelo, 7 A.D.3d 746, 776 N.Y.S.2d 898[2d Dept.2004] ).