- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
S.C. Dep't of Revenue v. C&M Mkt.
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court
Jul 2, 2014
PER CURIAM
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.Appeal from Richland County Ralph King Anderson, III, Administrative Law Judge
AFFIRMED
James Mixon Griffin and Jeffrey Ryan Heiskell, both of Lewis Babcock & Griffin, LLP, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Milton Gary Kimpson, Harry T. Cooper, Jr., Kathryn Ray Brown, and Sean Gordon Ryan, all of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: The Administrative Law Court's order is affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities: Ex parte Kenmore Shoe Co., 50 S.C. 140, 147, 27 S.E. 682, 684 (1897) (in rem judgment "bind[s] third persons [and is] conclusive evidence against all the world") (internal citation omitted); MRI at Belfair, LLC v. South Carolina Dep't of Health and Enviro. Control, 394 SC. 567, 716 S.E.2d 111 (Ct. App. 2011) (ALC is fact finder entitled to weigh witness credibility).
AFFIRMED. TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.