Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

TOWNES v. ALEXANDER

Supreme Court of South Carolina.
Apr 21, 1904
Judgment
Subsequent
References
CaseIQ
Case Information
CITATION CODES
citation codes
Attorney(S)

Messrs. Oscar Hodges, Haynesworth, Parker Patterson, for appellant (no argument given Reporter). Mr. B.M. Shuman, contra, cites: What is preference under bankrupt act: Act of 1898, sec. 60; Loveland on Proc. in Bank., sec. 159; 64 S.C. 457; 97 U.S. 80; 103 U.S. 293; 64 S.C. 457; 108 U.S. 66 . . . As to agency: 1 Ency., 1178. Fraud of husband cannot bind wife unless she had notice: 38 S.C. 457; 108 U.S. 66. Mortgage paid cannot be restored: 95 U.S. 3; 97 U.S. 304.

ACTS

No Acts

See more information ... Less ...
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

April 21, 1904. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. JUSTICE JONES.

The decree of the Circuit Court and appellant's exceptions thereto are herewith officially reported. After carefully considering the exceptions, we overrule the same and are satisfied to adopt the conclusions of fact and law in the Circuit decree, for the reasons therein stated.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

© 2026 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

x

Alert

Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.
Sign Up Login
x