CAROLINA AGENCY CO. v. GARLINGTON

Messrs. Dial Todd, for appellant, cite: Construction of attachment statutes: 31 S.C. 307; 24 S.C. 202; 6 S.C. 169; 10 S.C. 469; 13 S.C. 478; 21 S.C. 584; 32 S.C. 157; 3 Ency., 184: 4 Cyc., 400. Verification of the complaint: 50 S.C. 192; 33 S.C. 254; 4 Cyc., 412; 1 Bail., 185; 6 S.C. 169; 10 S.C. 469; 21 S.C. 583; 24 S.C. 202; 25 S.C. 461; 31 S.C. 47, 444; 42 S.C. 162; 31 S.C. 301. Amount claimed is not specified: Code of Proc., 250; 32 S.C. 159; Drake on At., 86; 4 Cyc., 444, 445, 500; 73 Me., 404; 5 N.Y. Supp., 568: 1 Shinn on At., 214, 16; 32 S.C. 159; 12 La. Ann., 110. This action is not within the Code provisions: Code of Proc., 248; Harp., 219; 78 S.C. 20; 31 S.C. 368; 41 S.C. 22; 58 S.C. 406; 31 S.C. 360; 18 Abb. Pr., 291; 3 Ency., 193, 184; 3 Abb. N.S. (N. Y.), 248; Drake on Att., secs. 9, 34; 1 Shinn on At., 31; 4 Cyc., 459; 4 Cyc., 440; 25 N.W., 21. Action of the plaintiff's agent to commence the action: 107 Va., 187; 71 N. J.L., 434. This action cannot be maintained in our courts: 24 L.Ed., 565; 144 U.S. 44; 39 S.C. 497; 4 Cyc., 457, 10; 33 S.C. 353; 113 Ga. 259. Messrs. Logan Edmunds, contra, cite: Will an attachment lie in an equity cause? 14 Stat., 474; Act Dec. 23, 1879; 50 S.C. 12; 78 S.C. 20; 41 S.C. 22; 31 S.C. 26, 361; 58 S.C. 398; 3 Pom. Eq. Jur., 465; 52 Am. R., 662; 85 Col., 642; 35 S.W. 708; 5 Minn., 569; Drake on Att., secs. 27, 34; 12 Ohio State, 165; 11 Ill., 471; 24 Neb. 782; 89 Fed.R., 964. Sufficiency of allegations of departure: 31 S.C. 46; 37 S.C. 87; 39 S.C. 484. Amount claimed is sufficiently and definitely set forth: 62 S.C. 526; 6 S.C. 169; 4 Cyc., 494; 13 Louis, 345; Drake on At., sec. 95. Action is sustainable in our Courts, 95 U.S. 174; 35 S.C. 94; 5 Rich., 63; 10 Wall, 306; 61 Miss., 170.