Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

FLEMING v. ROYALL et al

Supreme Court of South Carolina.
Apr 16, 1928
Judgment
Subsequent
References
CaseIQ
Case Information
CITATION CODES
citation codes
DOCKET NO.

12430

Attorney(S)

Messrs. Lee Royall and R.M. Lofton, for appellants. Messrs. Gorge Von Kolnitz, and Thomas Lumpkin, for respondents, cite: Liberal Construction given to constitutional questions that may be raised affecting the passage of Acts and Joint Resolutions: 16 S.C. 56; 76 S.C. 331. Details of legislation need not be expressed in the title: 74 S.C. 448; 23 S.C. 427; 30 S.C. 7 36 S.C. 125; 39 S.C. 307; 71 S.C. 457; 18 S.C. 466; 77 S.C. 260; 89 S.C. 84; 92 S.C. 313; 130 S.C. 434. Form of ballot: 12 C.J., 690; 120 S.C. 68. Cases distinguished: 130 S.C. 437. Parishes are corporate entities: 112 S.C. 31; 2 Stat., 328-30; Secs. 1305, 1307, Code; 61 S.C. 205; Sec. 471, Code; 30 S.C. 587; Dillon on Munic. Corp. (5th Ed), Sec. 232. Art. 16, Sec. 1 Const. does not require more than one entry of each Journal: 120 S.C. 68; 114 S.C. 419; 100 S.C. 165; 39 S.C. 307.

ACTS

No Acts

See more information ... Less ...
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

April 16, 1928. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. JUSTICE STABLER.

These two cases, by the consent of the parties, were heard together by Judge Grimball. The Circuit Decree contains a full discussion of the questions raised by the pleadings, and we approve, as satisfactory to this Court, both the reasoning and the conclusions of the trial Judge in both cases. An examination of the record on appeal does not disclose that the trial Court committed error as complained of by the appellants.

The judgment of this Court is that the judgment of the Circuit Court in each of the cases be affirmed.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WATTS, and MESSRS. JUSTICES COTHRAN, BLEASE, and CARTER concur.

© 2026 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

x

Alert

Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.
Sign Up Login
x