GRAY v. THOMAS et al

Messrs. Padgett Moorer and J. Heyward Jenkins, attorneys for Estate of Edwin Denby, appellants, cite: Mutual promise constitutes valuable consideration: 124 S.C. 68; 117 S.E., 356; 158 S.E., 635; 159 S.E., 365; 160 S.C. 188; 158 S.E., 272. Power of bank officials during thirty-day liquidation period: 123 S.C. 1; 115 S.E., 812; 150 S.C. 220; 147 S.E., 863; 141 S.C. 370; 139 S.E., 793; 144 S.C. 147; 142 S.E., 239; 148 S.C. 100; 145 S.E., 706. Waiver: 40 C.J., 256. Party may be estopped to plead fraud by own carelessness: 129 S.C. 226; 123 S.E., 845; 146 S.C. 385; 144 S.E., 82. Holder in due course of negotiable note has protection of mortgage: 97 S.C. 136; 26 S.C. 506; 134 S.C. 237; 117 S.C. 140; 91 S.C. 455. Mr. W. Brantley Harvey, for respondent.