Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

RHODES et al. v. BLACK et al

Supreme Court of South Carolina.
Jul 8, 1933
Judgment
Subsequent
References
CaseIQ
Case Information
CITATION CODES
citation codes
DOCKET NO.

13661

Attorney(S)

Mr. Leon L. Rice, for appellants, cites: As to habendum clause showing intent: 57 S.C. 173; 164 S.C. 427; 106 S.C. 304; 123 S.C. 175; 102 S.C. 234; 165 S.C. 111; 76 S.C. 38; 120 S.C. 212. Construction of will drawn by layman: 161 S.C. 235; 64 S.C. 256. Messrs. G.C. Sullivan and John K. Hood, Jr., for respondents, cite: Intention of testator should govern: 1 Rich., 161; 23 S.C. 232; 78 S.C. 334; 82 S.C. 66; 150 S.C. 249; 76 S.C. 166; 112 S.C. 113; 132 S.C. 306. Words may be changed to get at intention: 1 DeSaus., 353; 64 S.C. 216; 116 S.C. 228; 41 S.E., 898.

ACTS

No Acts

See more information ... Less ...
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

July 8, 1933. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BLEASE.

The very able decree of his Honor, Circuit Judge Greene, in this cause, appealed from by the defendants, which will be reported, being entirely satisfactory to this Court, and requiring nothing else to be said to sustain it, is affirmed.

MESSRS. JUSTICES STABLER, CARTER and BONHAM concur.

© 2026 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

x

Alert

Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.
Sign Up Login
x