LYNCH et al. v. LYNCH et al

Mr. M.L. Meadors and Messrs. Willcox, Hardee, Houck Wallace, all of Florence, counsel for appellant, cite: As to "gifts inter vivos": 28 C.J., 621, 622. As to constructive delivery: 24 A.J., Sec. 27, page 744; 28 C.J., Sec. 26, page 637; See Annotations, 99 A.L.R., 1078, 24 A.J., 758, 28 C.J., Sec., 45, page 649; 45 Utah, Ann. Cas., 1917-E, 363; 81 Ky., 425, 50 Am., Rep., 172; 193 S.C. 12, 8 S.E.2d 858; 24 A.J., 758; 119 Mich., 563, 75 Am. St. Rep., 430; 99 Am. St. Rep., 764; 13 A.J., page 398; 13 A.J., page 415. Mr. Henry E. Davis, of Florence, counsel for respondent, cites: As to completion of "gift inter vivos": 182 S.C. 133, 188 S.E., 789; 193 S.C. 484, 8 S.E.2d 858. As to ownership of Stock in relation to creditors: 8 Wheat., 229, 5 L.Ed., 602 (1807 — Opinion by Chief Justice Marshall); 8 Peters, 220, 8 L.Ed., 923. As to requisites for setting aside preferential transfer: 64 S.C. 354, 42 S.E., 169.