CAROLINA VENEER LBR. CO. v. A.M.L. INS. CO

Mr. Stephen Nettles, of Greenville, and Messrs. Royall Wright, of Florence, Counsel for Appellant, cite: As to "Coverage" limitations of the Indemnity Policy: 199 S.C. 325, at page 333, 19 S.E.2d 463; 196 S.C. 515, 14 S.E.2d 16; (Ala.), 199 So., 868, at page 869. Messrs. McEachin Townsend, of Florence, Counsel for Respondent, cite: As to "Coverage" of Indemnity Policy: 194 S.C. 67, 9 S.E.2d 27; 87 F.2d 988; (C. C.A.), 297 F., 580; 123 A.L.R., 1149; 190 S.C. 252, 2 S.E.2d 796; 53 S.Ct., 380, 288 U.S. 162; (N.C.), 4 S.E.2d 507; (Ind.), 14 N.E.2d 919; 16 N.E.2d 698, 117 A.L.R., 1293; (Ala.), 199 So., 868. As to Obligation of Insurer to Defend Action Against Employer: 89 F.2d 988; 130 A.L.R., 178, Annot.; (C.C. A., Pa.), 117 F.2d 845; 190 S.C. 252, 2 S.E.2d 796.