- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
SPILLER v. SPILLER
Superior Court of North Carolina
Apr 1, 1797
In proceedings for alimony, property of husband will not be put in hands of a receiver unless husband is about to remove it.
PER CURIAM.
We have ordered sequestrations of this kind when we have found the defendant withdrawing his property, or being about to move it and himself to avoid an execution of the decree; but not otherwise. It would be a great stretch of power in this Court to order a sequestration, or a bond for the absolute performance of the decree, whenever a bill is filed against a man by one who claims to be his wife.
See Anonymous, ante, 347.
Cited: Crews v. Crews, 175 N.C. 170.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.