FISHER v. HUSBAND

Bayard

Wilson for

Hall, Vining

Ridgely for

Defendant urged that there was a tenancy in common of the fence,

by 1

N.P. 411 trespass will not

Plaintiffs relied on 4

75, [title] "Estates," sections K

J, trespass will lie for removing

Though plaintiff prevailed, the point was not well examined, vide Co.

200 a, b. Trespass will lie for actual ouster, but not reception of

Trespass will lie for the destruction of the thing, but not for taking what may be retaken,