- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
SLOCUM v. NEWBY
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jul 1, 1810
It is no objection to the competency of a witness, that he is counsel for the plaintiff, and intends, if the debt sued for be recovered, to charge a commission for receiving and remitting the money.
From Perquimans.
BY THE COURT.
The objection to the witness goes to his credibility, and not to his competency. The rule discharged.
Cited: White v. Beaman, 96 N.C. 287; Grant v. Hughes, ib., 188.
(424)
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.