Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

ROHLFS v. ROHLFS

Court of Errors and Appeals.
Jan 29, 1948

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the testimony and the briefs of counsel, and are of the opinion that the proofs fully support the decree appealed from.

The decree is affirmed. For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, BODINE, DONGES, COLIE, WACHENFELD, EASTWOOD, BURLING, WELLS, DILL, FREUND, McLEAN, JJ. 11.

For reversal — HEHER, SCHETTINO, JJ. 2.