- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
CHAIRMAN v. CLARK
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 1825
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
The record of a recovery by the creditor of an intestate against his administrator is not evidence in a suit by the creditor against the securities of the administrator.
PER CURIAM.
This case presents the precise question that was made in McKellar v. Bowell, ante, 34. In that case the Superior Court rejected the evidence properly; in this case it was erroneously admitted. The judgment here must consequently be
Reversed.
Cited: Armistead v. Harramond, post, 341; Governor v. Carter, 25 N.C. 341; Brown v. Pike, 74 N.C. 534; Moore v. Alexander, 96 N.C. 36.
(44)
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.