Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

LOVERIN v. SCHOOL-DISTRICT NO. 3, CROYDON

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Sullivan.
Jun 1, 1886
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

When, by Laws of 1885, c. 43, a school-district is abolished during the pendency of an action against it for the determination of the contested location of its school-house, the defendant's corporate successor, the town district, being the defendant in interest, should be made a defendant of record, and should have notice and an opportunity to be heard.

DOE, C. J.

Since the trial, district No. 3 has been abolished by c. 43, Laws 1885. The town district, being now the defendant in interest on the question of school-house location, should be made a defendant of record, and should have notice and an opportunity to be heard. The plaintiffs may move at the trial term for an amendment and notice; and the case is continued.

CLARK, J., did not sit: the others concurred.