- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
STATE v. BAGGY
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 1890
The defendant was an itinerant dentist, and was indicted for practicing his profession without a license.
MERRIMON, C. J.
We are unable to see any cause for this appeal. No error is assigned, and, upon examination, we find the record regular and unexceptionable. In such a case the judgment will be affirmed. S. v. Freeman, 93 N.C. 558; S. v. Bell, 103 N.C. 438.
Judgment affirmed.
(691)
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.