- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
MULLEN v. CANAL Co
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1894
Petition to Rehear.
Where, upon a petition to rehear a case decided in this Court, it does not appear that the decision was hastily made or that any material point of fact or law or any direct authority was overlooked, the rehearing will be refused.
PER CURIAM.
This is a petition to rehear a case in which the opinion was filed last term, 114 N.C. 8. It does not appear that it was decided hastily, nor that any material point of fact or law, or any direct authority, was overlooked. The petition must, therefore, be dismissed. Hudson v. Jordan, 110 N.C. 250, and cases cited in Clark's Code (2 Ed.), 712.
Petition dismissed.
Cited: Weisel v. Cobb, 122 N.C. 70; Hodgin v. Bank, 125 N.C. 503, 511.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.